Thursday, February 27, 2014

HR and Technology: To Infinity and Beyond

I love me some technology. Hours of my day are spend reading about it and drooling over it. So when it comes to combining two loves I get excited. The HR world is so much more than a gloomy room in the back of the office.

The HR world is moving up, all the way to the clouds, well cloud based at the least. Found this great article about the direction HR is taking technologically.


http://www.computerweekly.com/feature/What-does-2014-hold-for-HR-technology

No-one really argues about where HR technology is heading – unified, streamlined talent management suites, sharing datasets with other business functions, powered by predictive analytics and accessible everywhere.
The last few years have made this future clear – cloud-based talent management suites are now the gold standard in HR technology.  Suppliers who have not been traditionally cloud-based have muscled their way into the market. Oracle gobbled up Taleo. IBM took onKenexa. SAP acquired SuccessFactors. Workday, the poster child of the HR cloud era, has noticeably bulked up its offering.
HCM.jpg
Now that the battleground is set, it’s the nature of the battle that’s important. 2014 will see suppliers compete on two main grounds: complexity and simplicity. The behemoths of the internet – Google, Amazon – are incredibly complex, but they’ve proven that simple front-ends create scale. This lesson hasn’t been lost on HR  suppliers with keen appetites to grow their market share.

1. Predictive analytics will emerge as the year’s must-have technology

The biggest driver of greater complexity will be predictive analytics. One of the big points of confusion in 2013 was HR professionals talked about predictive analytics when they really meant reporting. (Reporting showcases historical trends in organisational behaviour, while predictive analytics asks pertinent questions of suitable datasets to forecast future outcomes.)
In a study by The Economist Intelligence Unit global executives ranked predictive analytics third on a list of the technologies they would prioritise over the next three years – after mobile and cloud-based services. As far back as 2012, Paul Hamerman, VP and principal analyst at Forrester Research, said that cloud had already become a pre-requisite for companies choosing HR solutions.
Jamie Lawrence, is editor of online HR publication HRZone. The site provides analysis and advice to help HR professionals perform their jobs more effectively and efficiently. Jamie was previously a small business journalist and a copywriter for an integrated digital agency
Uncertainty over the future business environment and the need for more powerful differentiation will no doubt drive demand for predictive analytics – their use in 2014 will be embryonic, but we’ll move into 2015 with more advanced capabilities in sight.
"Early forays by organisations and HR functions into predictive modelling have largely focused on predicting best hires given various candidate, job and employer factors, and also predicting retention risk which is fairly straightforward and logical in terms of analytics frameworks (e.g. tying to planned changes in compensation or benefits),” said veteran HR technology advisor Steve Goldberg, strategic advisor at SBG Consulting LLC.
“The next step in this evolution will perhaps be looking at things like 'if this employee was paired with that team or manager, they would be a star performer.' These type of predictive frameworks require more advanced skillsets in statistical analyses than what resides in most HR functions today, but this is truly about mining employee potential."

2. The methodology of predictive analytics will fall on the supplier’s shoulders

While HR directors are keen to get their hands on the power of predictive analytics, they are understandably wary. If we interpret data poorly, we make poor decisions.
Goldberg gave me the following example: losing more employees to direct competitors than they are losing to you may not be an issue if it’s mostly bottom-quartile performers that are leaving.

HOW CAN HR MANAGERS SELECT THE RIGHT TECHNOLOGY SUPPLIER?

  • Analyse existing HR processes and create a vision of where you want to be
  • Talk with references about how easy they found it was for people to adopt post-implementation
  • Focus program design on simple steps, shorter workflows and fewer options
There is a real risk that  poor data analysis could lead to catastrophic decisions. So HR departments must get data analytics right. But we won’t see them rushing to hire scientists. Predictive analytics is unproven. That budget can’t be justified.
According to Professor Stefan Strohmeier, an HR technology researcher from Saarland University, technology that can ‘hide’ the methodological and technical complexities of data analytics will be a driver for its successful, widespread adoption. Predictive analytics will be pushed by suppliers looking to gain competitive advantage in this emerging field.

3. A shared experience to implementation and development

At HR Tech Europe 2013,  a conference for HR and IT specialists, one of Workday’s senior executives, Amy Wilson, took to the stage with flagship clients HP and Diageo.
Catriona Mackie, global first point director of Diageo, said the global drinks manufacturer would be providing Workday with feedback on the implementation process to guide future software iterations. Because the Workday solution is cloud-based, Diageo will benefit from any improvements made. It’s a win-win situation for both parties.
The future of cloud-based HR technology development will be increasingly driven by this close working relationship between supplier and client. HR technology is sailing through unexplored territory and will continue to do so; ‘real-world’ experience is invaluable to the suppliers who must innovate to very short timescales.
But the nature of the relationship will define its success. Jason Averbook, Chief Business Innovation Officer at Appirio, which advises businesses on cloud computing,  highlighted three key qualities: expectation setting, communication and on-going transparency.
“Remembering that both customers and  suppliers have responsibilities towards meeting and exceeding expectations will give both parties more confidence. This in turn will help create collaborative processes that will drive software development based on real-world needs,” he said.

4. The increasing importance of self-service

Self-service allows HR departments to reduce the administrative burden by transferring responsibility for data-collection tasks from HR staff to employees.
If we demand more from dashboard reporting and predictive analytics, we’ll need to put more data in to get samples that we can trust. This will increase the self-reporting burden on employees and portals will have to be designed to ensure they are easy to use.
The challenge for suppliers will be maximising the amount of data absorbed while minimising workflow steps and ensuring the user journey is as fluid as possible. Customisation must also be strong because companies will not want to invest in pushing employees through workflow steps that aren’t mission-critical.
Simplicity is crucial. Graham Salisbury, Head of HR at poverty relief organisation ActionAid, said: “User adoption in self-service often causes headaches due to simple things such as browser compatibility. We need to have confidence these types of issues won’t be a problem.”
For Salisbury, complex self-service also ramps up the implementation budget.
“Intensive training in a system that employees and managers need to use daily is not a good start,” he said. “If a system’s complex, and every one of your 5000 employees needs to use it every day, that’s a pretty tough place to be.”

5. Business integration will become a deal-breaker…

Executives are fully aware of the power of integrating data and functionality across disparate business functions. HR will continue to own the talent management implementation, but downward pressure will push them towards solutions that can most easily integrate with core technology, such as CRM systems.
This problem will get more acute as predictive analytics ramps up the size of datasets and other functions want their slice of the analytics pie. This will increase the number of stakeholders who need targeted dashboards.
Too much information creates a mental gridlock where decisions become painful. Research from Bersin by Deloitte suggests that the more effective organisations provide single-purpose charts to managers – one for turnover, one for compensation comparison and so on.
Under the bonnet, greater analysis can be undertaken, but stakeholders just need to see the information that’s pertinent to them. This will be essential in driving the reflective, daily uptake that creates long-term value.
Jason Averbook said: “There are no more silos in business systems in today’s enterprise. The ability for the HR function to realise that their people processes and data truly create a hub of intelligence that needs to be consumed by other parts of the enterprise makes or breaks organisational success.
“Any HR system project today should be seen as a workplace initiative and tightly integrated into the overall enterprise experience for the workforce.”

6. ..but ROI against HR’s basic goals will remain the primary driver 

There are some sexy new developments in HR technology, but the biggest driver remains the same:  to help attract, reward, motivate and retain an effective group of employees.
Suppliers will need to remember that their solutions will live or die by the decisions of the HR department – it’s tempting to market talent management suites to the chief marketing officer or the finance diretor, hoping to entice them to convince HR, but HR will make the final decision. And delivering value throughout their own department remains their primary concern.
Steve Goldberg estimates a 20-30% variation in functionality among suppliers, but the differences most relevant to HR are ease-of-implementation and ease-of-use. Both of these drive core value in HR.
HR directors will talk to other companies who have been through the implementation process. If it’s laboured, drawn out, and does little to address HR’s core aims, that supplier won’t be making the shortlist.

Sunday, February 23, 2014

Hack Your Life

How many times have you received an email from a coworker or friend letting everyone know in their address book that the email they just sent out about (insert body part) enlargement was not from them but they were hacked? Well I don't know about you but I get more emails like that from my friend than emails just to say hi.

So hacking is a regular part of our life. Emails, phones, credit cards, governments, and Facebook. All subject to hacking. By and large the term "hacking" has a negative 90s connotation to it. However as with most words as time progresses the definition changes and evolves.

This weeks Ted video addresses the term hack and what it can mean to our sense of education, creatively, and ultimately the way we view happiness. It comes from hacking our life, finding a new way of approaching the same situation.

Now with most Ted Talks that I post I don't want to drown them out with my own analysis and take aways. But I hope that we can address our problems, projects, and roles in life whether family or work life as a mindset and not a method.






Friday, February 21, 2014

A New Way To Fly




Antedates are fun right? I love them. And if you are still reading you must take a fancy to them every now and then too. So heres this weeks "Remember When" installment.

The year was 1992, the country was still getting over big hair and leg warmers so we could only move up from there. The place was Greenville South Carolina home to Stevens Aviation a little-known aviation sales and maintenance company. Since late 1990 they has been using the (very catchy) slogan Plane Smart in their adverting. They were very pleased with the slogan until they discovered the goliath Southwest airlines had started using the same slogan.

So stop and thing for a second. You are Kurt Herwald CEO of Stevens Aviation you have a few choices here. Legal action, you'd probably win you were using the slogan before the Big Guy after all. But what would the cost be? Thousands, if not hundred of thousands of dollars in legal fees.
What Herwald did was, and Im using technical terms here, was Awesome. He challenged then Southwest CEO Herb Kelleher to an arm wrestling contest, winner keeps the slogan. The Malice in Dallas was born.


An arena was scheduled and hundreds gathered to see the contest. Cheerleaders cheered, booers booed, and shows of goodwill were dripping for the stands. The winner of the best out of three contest was Herwald of the now over night sensation Stevens Aviation. Who, when things couldn't get any better, announced that both companies could use the much loved slogan. EVERYONE WINS.
There are several factors to this story that I love. The first was that Herwald was not quick to involve the law. He used some very creative out of the box thinking to not only solve his problem but create a sensation publicity opportunity, reinventing his company.

The Build Network Staff (2013) has also drawn attention to how the event created amazing unity within each company and between the two. " 'They were so proud of the company and so excited for the visibility that Malice in Dallas gave to their work,' Herwald says. For months and years after the event, the change to company culture was palpable. Employees felt more connected to one another and to their work" (Blitz, 2014)

Despite Southwests stock doubling and a reported 6 million in increased profit (Blitz, 2014) it was the lasting effect on the employees that would be the true winner of the contest. If I am allowed to speculate (its my blog I make the rules) I would guess that this one out of the box crazy idea created the company and the culture that would be able to help it survive out of the attacks of recessions and terrorists.

Check out 6 part Southwest YouTube of the Malice in Dallas
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLD8C2A0EC0E1E4E69

References
Blitz, M. (2014). How Two Major Companies Used an Arm Wrestling Match Instead of Litigation to  Resolve a Dispute. Retrieved from http://www.todayifoundout.com/index.php/2014/02/two-major-  companies-decided-use-arm-wrestling-match-instead-lawsuits-resolve-dispute/
The Build Network Staff . (2013). 3 Lasting Lessons from Malice in Dallas. Retrieved from      http://www.inc.com/3-l lasting-lessons-from-malice-in-dallas.html


Friday, February 14, 2014

Angry Birds for Happy Employees

Industry surveys are pointing that the vast majority of cell phone users are using smart phones these days. But you really don't need industry surveys to know that, just go outside or inside anything and you will see empirical evidence to back me up. 

Employers also know this fact and its something thats on their mind. For most employers a smart phone can be seen at its best a time waster, something else that needs to be dealt with. Within other industries a cell phone is viewed as a security issue, think credit card companies or over the phone sales where credit card numbers are thrown around. 

I know for me my phone isn't ever too far away (on average only 11.6 inches away) at any given time. I have been know to turn around and go back three miles when its forgotten. When Im falling asleep its one of the two faces I see before I close my eyes. I wouldn't say it ranks up there with my family, I mean if a masked gunman told me "hand over the iPhone or your kid gets it" I wouldn't hesitate (too long) before tossing my phone over to him. 

Still these gadgets are an important part of who we are today. They are woven into the fabric of our social interactions (for good or bad) and they are most likely not going anywhere, bedsides everywhere with us. So are they all that terrible in the workplace, most of that answer might depend on who you ask, but maybe not.

Kendra Clark (2014) a writer for SIOP seems to feel that the use of smart phones in the work place can aid to and improve an employees sense of well being. Go figure! Results from a very cool study found that when an employee was able to take mirco breaks"Such as texting a friend. a perceived well-being at the end of the work day.The results also show that on days when employees used smartphones more for social media use, they reported higher well-being at the end of the workday than when using their phones for entertainment or personal reasons" (Clark, 2014). 

Most employers are all about a happier work force. When the working stiff is happy tasks are done and everyone is gelling. But at what cost? To play devils advocate Clark looked into that too. Research pointed to employees only spending an average of 20-25 combined minuets a day using a smart phone (Clark, 2014). Thats hardly enough to really damage workplace production. And is comparable to the smoking break a smoking employee might need.

As with EVERYTHING there needs to be limits before that inch turns to a mile. But there is a lot to be said about compromise and who knows this can open up to some wicked office wide Angry Bird competitions. 





Clark, K. (2014). Let Them Tweet!. Retrieved from http://www.siop.org/article_view.aspx?article=1222#.UwUVakJdVI1

Tuesday, February 4, 2014

Culture and Fundamental Attribution Error- An Essay


Culture and Fundamental Attribution Error
Chris Richards


“Begin challenging your own assumptions. Your assumptions are your windows on the world. Scrub them off every once in awhile, or the light won't come in.”
Alan Alda

            A large part of human nature is attempting to gain control of the world around us. Sometimes this control is physical other times it is an emotional control. Human being seek to make sense of the situations around them. This control and this sense is the cornerstone of philosophy, science, and everyday life.
            In social situations human nature still attempts to make sense of people and their behavior. Discussed in the following essay will be truths and errors regarding the discovery of the cause of peoples behavior(Attribution Theory, 2011).
            Within social psychology there are many theories that attempt to explain human behavior within a social setting. One theory is the Attribution Theory. The attribution theory states that when a person makes an error they are more likely to attribute it to an outside factor. For instance if a person does not get a job, they may say “The interviewer asked dumb questions”. Distancing themselves from blame.
            The second half of the Attribution Theory is when a person is observed. When another has erred the error is often attributed to inward fault. For example, if a person is late it might be said that they are lazy and irresponsible. This assumption would be based on internal attributions as opposed to even considering any external factors like a sick child or traffic accident as the cause for the tardiness (Attribution Theory, 2011).
            When a person tries to explain or understand another’s behavior in a social setting by focusing on the abilities, personality traits, or skills and any situational or external factors are ignored, a fundamental attribution error has occurred.
            Fundamental attribution errors can occur in every walk of life and in nearly every situation, from in the home to in the work place. However an interesting phenomenon (Langdridge & Butt, 2004) regarding the fundamental attribution error is that it occurs more often in certain cultures. In cultures that are more individualistic, which are typically Western cultures such as The United States, Great Britain, and Australia (Hofstede’s cultural factors, 2011).
            Individualistic cultures value free thinking, autonomy, and individually. They are conditioned to prefer dispositional factors rather than situational factors when socializing. Due to the nature of individualistic cultures, they are more likely to commit fundamental attribution errors (Finkelstein, 2011)
            On the other hand, cultures that tend to be more collectivistic in nature, such as Asian cultures, will be less likely to commit the fundamental attribution error. Collectivistic cultures tend to see the individual as the whole group where in Western individualistic cultures tend to see the person as part of the group if not a separate entity (Bouncken & Lotter, 2008)
            Since collectivistic cultures see themselves as part of the group and equals with others in a group or situation they would be less likely to attribute errors in others as internal or dispositional factors.
            A firm understanding of this principle would be invaluable to those who may travel to cultures that are different from their own. Many business dealings would depend on an understanding of who a client may perceive a social satiation.
            It is not enough to understand human nature from the one perspective. In today’s every growing and expanding marketplace, the world is becoming a very small place. As the world gets smaller mankind will only strengthen its attempt to gain control and make sense of it.


References

Attribution Theory. (2011). Retrieved from
Bouncken, R. B., & Lotter, F. (2008). Intergrated Learning patterns: A comarison of          Individualism and collectivism cultures. Journal Of The Academy Of Business &            Economics, 8(2), 1-11.
Finkelstein M. (2011), Correlation of Individualism and collectivism: Predicting volunteer             activty. Social Behavior & Personality. Social Behavior & Personality: An International             Journal, 39(5), 597-606.
Langdridge, D., & Butt, T. (2004). The fundamental attribution error: A phenomenological            critique. British Journal Of Social Psychology, 43(3), 357-369.
Hofstede's cultural factors. (2011). Retrieved from